Papers by Lalit K Jain
BIG-Bench Extra Hard (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Mehran Kazemi, Bahare Fatemi, Hritik Bansal, John Palowitch, Chrysovalantis Anastasiou, Sanket Vaibhav Mehta, Lalit K Jain, Virginia Aglietti, Disha Jindal, Peter Chen, Nishanth Dikkala, Gladys Tyen, Xin Liu, Uri Shalit, Silvia Chiappa, Kate Olszewska, Yi Tay, Vinh Q. Tran, Quoc V Le, Orhan Firat
| Challenge: | Current benchmarks for large language model reasoning focus on math and coding abilities, leaving a gap in evaluating broader reasoning proficiencies. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate general reasoning in large language models . they use BIG-Bench and its harder version BIG-Benefit Hard to assess general reasoning . |
| Outcome: | The new benchmark pushes the boundaries of LLM reasoning evaluation. |
Bridging the Creativity Understanding Gap: Small-Scale Human Alignment Enables Expert-Level Humor Ranking in LLMs (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Kuan Lok Zhou, Jiayi Chen, Siddharth Suresh, Reuben Narad, Timothy T. Rogers, Lalit K Jain, Robert D Nowak, Bob Mankoff, Jifan Zhang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown significant limitations in understanding creative content, as demonstrated by Hessel et al. (2023)’s influential work on the New Yorker Cartoon Caption Contest. |
| Approach: | They propose to decompose humor understanding into three components and improve each by enhancing visual understanding through improved annotation and utilizing LLM-generated humor reasoning and explanations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves 82.4% accuracy in caption ranking, significantly better than the previous 67% benchmark and matches the performance of world-renowned human experts in this domain. |